Evaluating tactical adjustments

It seems the user left, and I’m not sure of the exact timing. I want to analyze the tactical implications of Inigo's departure. This affects left-footed LCB depth and some defensive strategies, particularly in counterpressing and set-pieces. I’ll suggest adjustments like lowering the defensive line and modifying pressing tactics, along with specific metrics to track the changes, avoiding claims about real numbers. I’ll format these suggestions as bullet points for clarity.Proposing tactical adaptations

I need to use careful language like "通常会" and "可能会" when discussing potential outcomes. If the user wants specific Opta numbers, I should ask them to specify matches. I should also consider Martinez's profile—his left-footedness and aggressive play—because without him, using players like Christensen could alter angles and increase turnovers. I’ll discuss the keeper's role and the impact of possible injuries, particularly focusing on transition defense, injury effects on midfielders, and the pressing intensity of forwards. I'll suggest structural adaptations, including inverting fullbacks if necessary.Suggesting tactical modifications

I want to propose staggered pivots and delay triggers, along with using narrow wingers to force opponents wide. I think we should adopt a more conservative offside trap and have the keeper kick long to minimize risks. For personnel, I could suggest Araujo at RCB and Kounde at RB, with Romeu possibly covering as a 6 based on past usage, though I should be cautious in presenting this. I’ll mention training patterns and relevant KPIs to monitor. I could also ask if the user wants a visual or match-specific breakdown.Structuring the analysis

I need to provide clear sections, including the impact of Inigo's departure, injuries, tactical consequences of the high line, data signals to monitor, and suggested adjustments. I think I can keep this concise and polished in Chinese with bullet points, which sounds great! I don’t need to cite files or include any code, just straightforward and to the point. I might add short headers within .. to guide the structure, while ensuring it remains easy to read.